Monthly Archives: May 2012

The Iranian Syndrome (1979)

The Iranian Syndrome (1979)

The China Syndrome (1979)

History of the 1979 Iranian revolution

Muslim Brotherhood Senior Member extols Iranian leaders, scoffs at U.S.

Speaking at the International islamic unity conference in Tehran on Monday, Muslim Brotherhood Senior Member, Kamal el-Helbawy [el-Helbawi], praised the leader of Iran’s Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the current leaders of Iran. El-Helbawy derided the U.S. and western countries, and called “the [present] leader of Iran” the “number one figure of the Muslim world.”

Debunking the Palestine Lie

Debunking the Palestine Lie

Debunking the Palestine Lie

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has launched an international campaign to achieve recognition by the United Nations for an independent Palestinian state. Abbas and his international supporters claim that only Israel (with the United States) stands in the way of this act of historical justice, which would finally bring about peace in the Middle East.

This video debunks the Palestinians’ claim and shows that Abbas has been lying about the origins and history of the conflict. Palestinian leaders have rejected partition plans that would have given them much more land for their independent state than the Jews were offered for theirs. Rather than being the innocent victims of a “dispossession” at the hands of the Israelis, the Palestinians rejected reasonable compromises and instead pursued their aim of getting rid of the only Jewish state in the world.

Al Qaeda could open a new front in northern Israel


The presence of terrorists linked to al Qaeda among the rebels fighting the regime Bashal al-Assad in Syria has been for several weeks.

 The army is preparing for a scenario in which the Islamists could prepare the ground for attacks against Israel.

 But esteem this is what the commander of the North Front, General Yair Golan, who think the Syrian border could become, at the time of the fall of the Syrian regime, the new forward line of Hezbollah, but also Al Qaeda.

 Golan said that “when states fall, terrorism flourishes,” adding that this will happen can not be “tomorrow morning in the case of Syria, but the hypothesis is likely in a few weeks or months.”

 The presence of group Al Qaeda would not be foreign to the formidable arsenal of Syria, Bashar Al Assad that continues to expand daily, weapons of mass destruction-mostly chemical weapons, long range missiles, etc..

 Speaking at a conference marking the anniversary of the first Lebanon war, he said Israel had the right to “stop by all means transfers and arms smuggling from Syria, Lebanon and Hezbollah, “as implying that military action would be legitimate on the subject. (Source: IsraelInfos)


Except In my View It is Not Could But ARE !!!

I feel that Nobody Cares That Under Our Very Eyes Is Bulding A Large Scall War !

Espace détente, poésie, judaïsme et lutte contre la désinformation

La présence de terroristes liés à al Qaeda parmi les rebelles qui combattent le régime de Bashal al-Assad en Syrie est avérée depuis plusieurs semaines.

L’armée se prépare à un scénario selon lequel les islamistes pourraient préparer depuis le terrain des attaques contre Israël.

C’est ce qu’estime le commandant du Front nord, le général Yaïr Golan, qui pense que la frontière syrienne pourrait devenir, au moment de la chute du régime syrien, la nouvelle ligne avancée du Hezbollah, mais également d’Al Qaeda.

Golan rappelle que “lorsque les états tombent, le terrorisme fleurit”, ajoutant que cela ne se produira peut être pas “demain matin dans le cas de la Syrie mais l’hypothèse est probable dans quelques semaines ou mois”.

La présence de groupe d’Al Qaeda ne serait pas étrangère au formidable arsenal syrien, que Bashar Al Assad continue d’élargir au quotidien, des armes de destructions massives essentiellement –armes chimiques, missiles longue…

View original post 56 more words



It’s Said Here From Their Own Propaganda ! :

Bulletin of the Oppression of Women March 29 – May 26, 2012

Jihad and Sharia — What’s the Connection? Women

Muslim Brotherhood Plotting To Take Over Jordan?

Muslim Brotherhood Plotting To Take Over Jordan?
by Khaled Abu Toameh
May 30, 2012 at 5:00 am

What is clear by now is that no matter how much the king does to fight corruption and implement reforms, the Muslim Brotherhood will continue to argue that it is not enough. Many Arabs feel that President Obama’s endorsement of the Muslim Brotherhood has emboldened the Islamists and increased their desire to drive moderate and secular rulers out of the Middle East. Unless the US administration stops flirting with the Muslim Brotherhood, Jordan will be turned into an Islamic republic.

Jordanian government officials say there are growing signs that the kingdom’s powerful Muslim Brotherhood organization has plans to overthrow the regime.

The organization, according to the officials, has succeeded in hijacking the anti-corruption and pro-democracy protests that have swept Jordan over the past year.

Today, most of the anti-regime demonstrations throughout the kingdom are being initiated and led by Muslim Brotherhood supporters whose goal is to turn Jordan into an Islamic republic.

Many Arabs feel that President Barack Obama’s endorsement of the Muslim Brotherhood has emboldened the Islamists and increased their appetite to drive moderate and secular rulers out of the Arab world.

King Abdullah has good reason to be worried about the Muslim Brotherhood’s efforts to hijack the pro-reform drive in the kingdom. This concern was reportedly one of the main reasons that the monarch replaced Prime Minister Awn Khasawna — a staunch supporter of rapprochement with Muslim Brotherhood and its Palestinian sister-movement, Hamas — a few weeks ago.

In a bid to appease the anti-corruption and pro-democracy campaigners, King Abdullah has also taken a number of unprecedented measures against a number of senior government officials suspected of embezzling public funds and abusing their powers. The king has replaced three prime ministers since the “Arab Spring” began and has thrown a number of former officials into prison, but all this has not satisfied the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is clear by now is that no matter how much the king does to fight corruption and implement reforms, the Muslim Brotherhood will continue to argue that this is not enough.

“They have learned from the Egyptian experience, where Muslim Brotherhood also hijacked the anti-regime protests that were triggered by secular and genuine reformists,” explained a senior Jordanian government official in Amman.

Another Jordanian official said that his government has proof that “outside forces” were backing Muslim Brotherhood’s scheme to “spread chaos and anarchy in the kingdom” by exploiting demands for reform and democracy.

The official pointed out that some representatives of Muslim Brotherhood recently visited Turkey, where they reportedly met with former CIA deputy director Steven Kappes and former British MI5 chief Eliza Manningham-Buller.

Osama Rantisi, a prominent Jordanian journalist and political analyst, claimed that Kappes and Manningham-Buller pledged in the meeting that “the US government and its intelligence services will support the Muslim Brotherhood goals of reaching power.”

The claim has been vehemently denied by both the US government and Muslim Brotherhood.

Muslim Brotherhood leaders say the report about a conspiracy backed by the US and Britain to help the group topple King Abdullah’s regime is part of a smear campaign waged by Jordan’s General Intelligence Department.

Some Jordanians have also pointed to Iran and its proxy Hizbullah militia in Lebanon as being behind a Muslim Brotherhood scheme to stage a coup in the kingdom.

But while these efforts have persuaded many Jordanians to stop their street protests, Muslim Brotherhood supporters continue to stage protests and incite Jordanians against the regime.

What has particularly worried King Abdullah is that the Muslim Brotherhood has managed to “infiltrate” many powerful Jordanian tribes, which have always been known as traditional and staunch supporters of the monarchy.

Unless the US Administration stops flirting with Muslim Brotherhood, Jordan will be turned into a radical Islamic republic and a source of further instability in the Middle East.







Being a Free People!

 • Do you like being independent and autonomous?
 • Do you appreciate the freedom you enjoy in Switzerland?
 • Do you have your own opinion and express it like you knowing what it means responsibility for oneself?
 In Switzerland, there are few people who appreciate such values as freedom and autonomy. There are people who would like to leave the EU with the task to care for all, by doing so lose to Swiss citizens and their right to self-determination. They argue that EU membership is inevitable.

 The movement for an interparty Action Independent and Neutral Switzerland ASIN fights against this mindset, because freedom and independence for the Swiss values are too precious to be sacrificed lightly.

 Movement interparti who needs you.

 • Since 1986, the ASIN is committed to defend the independence, direct democracy and neutrality of Switzerland.
 • The Run is an independent association.
 • The ASIN is not a political party. Of citizens of all political persuasions are included.
 • Members of ASIN come from all regions of our country.
 • The ASIN finances its operations with annual dues and donations.

Etre un peuple libre !!!

•Aimez-vous être indépendant et autonome ?
•Appréciez-vous la liberté dont vous jouissez en Suisse ?
•Avez-vous votre propre avis et aimez-vous l’exprimer tout en sachant ce que signifie la responsabilité pour soi-même ?
En Suisse, il existe des personnalités qui apprécient peu des valeurs comme la liberté et l’autonomie. Il y a des gens qui aimeraient laisser à l’UE le soin de s’occuper de tout, en faisant de la sorte perdre aux citoyennes et citoyens suisses leur droit à l’autodétermination. Ils affirment qu’une adhésion à l’UE est inévitable.

Le mouvement interpartis Action pour une Suisse indépendante et neutre ASIN se bat contre cet état d’esprit, car la liberté et l’indépendance pour la Suisse sont des valeurs trop précieuses pour être sacrifiées à la légère.

Un mouvement interparti qui a besoin de vous.

•Depuis 1986, l’ASIN s’engage pour défendre l’indépendance, la démocratie directe et la neutralité de la Suisse.
•L’ASIN est une association indépendante.
•L’ASIN n’est pas un parti politique. Des citoyennes et citoyens de tous les bords politiques en font partie.
•Les membres de l’ASIN proviennent de toutes les régions de notre pays.
•L’ASIN finance ses activités avec les cotisations annuelles et des dons.

ASIN Launches on neutrality:
The principle of neutrality must be registered in the Federal Constitution !!!

After his first popular initiative entitled “International Agreements: the people speak!” Action for Independent and Neutral Switzerland (ASIN) is now launching its second popular initiative. The ASIN founded in 1986 has its roots in the Committee vote against the accession of Switzerland to the UN. 25 years later, the ASIN notes with disappointment that neutrality is increasingly undermined. The popular initiative “For a neutral Switzerland, both on the world and committed to humanitarian values (neutrality Initiative)” will now finally create the necessary transparency policy of neutrality.

The principle of permanent neutrality and army do not appear in the Federal Constitution. This is paradoxical, because the vast majority of Swiss citizens supported neutrality, but the Bern government policy continues to betray the essence practicing what she calls the active neutrality. That is why the association interparty ASIN think it is extremely urgent that the perpetual neutrality of Switzerland and army is enshrined in the Constitution. For this purpose, it should be added to Article 54a (new) of the popular initiative “For a neutral Switzerland, both open-minded and committed to humanitarian values”: “Switzerland is neutral. It applies the principle of perpetual armed neutrality. “A second article of the Constitution specifies the commitments of the Swiss army abroad that are compatible with a credible neutrality: art. 58 al. 2a (new) 2a “The military conducts missions abroad only as part of aid disaster. “. The formation of the air force abroad is not prevented. The president and committee member ASIN initiative Dr. Pirmin Schwander, National, found that the zeal in foreign policy and military rallying undermine the credibility and security of our country. Swiss citizens want neutrality. That is why the initiative neutrality advocates seamlessly to a Swiss independent, confident, cosmopolitan and humanitarian. In the current financial and economic crisis, it is particularly important that Switzerland is consolidating its strengths and pillars. National Councillor Luzi Stamm, a member of the Steering Committee, has shown that EU membership is not compatible with a credible neutrality. The example of Austria shows this clearly. He described the problem very active neutrality and noted that only a Swiss who practice a credible neutrality can provide humanitarian assistance and use his good offices with diplomatic means. Anne Fournier, a member of the Run and the Initiative Committee, noted for its neutrality as one of the most important pillars of Switzerland a safe and effective. Moreover, we must put a stop to it according to the internationalization of the Swiss army. Our military must be able to ensure neutrality on its own. Gartenmann Werner, director of Run, noted that the popular initiative “For a neutral Switzerland, both open-minded and committed to humanitarian values” filled the gap in the Federal Constitution. With only two constitutional articles, it summarizes the principle of perpetual neutrality and army. This initiative reflects the will of citizens and establishes clear rules for the future policy of neutrality. This initiative reinforces the government side of our country abroad, the EU and the UN.

ASIN lance l’initiative sur la neutralité :
Le principe de la neutralité doit être inscrit dans la Constitution fédérale

Après sa première initiative populaire intitulée «Accords internationaux: la parole au peuple!», l’Action pour une Suisse indépendante et neutre (ASIN) lance maintenant sa deuxième initiative populaire. L’ASIN fondée en 1986 puise ses racines dans le Comité de votation contre l’adhésion de la Suisse à l’ONU. 25 ans plus tard, l’ASIN constate avec désenchantement que la neutralité est de plus en plus sapée. L’initiative populaire «Pour une Suisse neutre, à la fois ouverte sur le monde et attachée aux valeurs humanitaires (Initiative sur la neutralité)» va maintenant enfin créer la transparence requise en matière de politique de neutralité.

Le principe de la neutralité perpétuelle et armée ne figure pas dans la Constitution fédérale. Cela est paradoxal, car l’immense majorité des citoyennes et citoyens suisses soutiennent la neutralité, mais la Berne fédérale politique ne cesse d’en trahir l’essence en pratiquant ce qu’elle appelle la neutralité active. C’est pourquoi l’association interpartis ASIN pense qu’il est extrêmement urgent que la neutralité perpétuelle et armée de la Suisse soit inscrite dans la Constitution. À cet effet, il convient d’y ajouter l’article 54a (nouveau) de l’initiative populaire « Pour une Suisse neutre, à la fois ouverte sur le monde et attachée aux valeurs humanitaires »: « La Suisse est neutre. Elle applique le principe de la neutralité armée perpétuelle.  » Un deuxième article constitutionnel précise les engagements de l’armée suisse à l’étranger qui sont compatibles avec une neutralité crédible : l’art. 58 al. 2bis (nouveau) 2bis « L’armée effectue des missions à l’étranger exclusivement dans le cadre de l’aide en cas de catastrophe. ». La formation de l’armée de l’air à l’étranger n’est toutefois pas empêchée. Le président de l’ASIN et membre du Comité d’initiative Dr. Pirmin Schwander, Conseiller national, a constaté que le zèle en matière de politique extérieure et le ralliement militaire nuisent à la crédibilité et à la sécurité de notre pays. Les citoyens suisses veulent la neutralité. C’est pourquoi l’initiative sur la neutralité plaide en toute transparence pour une Suisse indépendante, sûre, ouverte au monde et humanitaire. Dans la crise économique et financière actuelle, il importe notamment que la Suisse consolide ses atouts et piliers. Le Conseiller national Luzi Stamm, également membre du Comité d’initiative, a démontré qu’une adhésion à l’UE n’est pas compatible avec une neutralité crédible. L’exemple de l’Autriche le montre clairement. Il a qualifié la neutralité active de très problématique et a signalé que seule une Suisse qui pratique une neutralité crédible peut fournir une aide humanitaire et proposer ses bons offices avec des moyens diplomatiques. Anne Fournier, membre du Comité de l’ASIN et du Comité d’initiative, a constaté quant à elle que la neutralité est un des piliers les plus importants d’une Suisse sûre et performante. De plus, il faut selon elle mettre le holà à l’internationalisation de l’armée suisse. Notre armée doit être en mesure de garantir la neutralité par ses propres moyens. Werner Gartenmann, directeur de l’ASIN, a relevé que l’initiative populaire «Pour une Suisse neutre, à la fois ouverte sur le monde et attachée aux valeurs humanitaires » complète judicieusement la Constitution fédérale. Avec deux articles constitutionnels seulement, elle résume le principe de la neutralité perpétuelle et armée. Cette initiative reflète la volonté des citoyens et met en place des règles claires pour la politique de neutralité future. Cette initiative renforce le gouvernement de notre pays face à l’étranger, à l’UE et à l’ONU.

Boycott Switzerland’s Migros Supermarket !

Boycott Switzerland’s Migros Supermarket

Swiss Chain to Label Products from Israeli ‘Settlements’; Boycott Migros Market Instead

Switzerland’s largest supermarket chain, Migros, announced on Tuesday that it will tell its customers if products have come from Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria (Shomron) and east Jerusalem.

Judea and Samaria
According to a report on SwissInfo, the reason for the decision is Migros’ desire to offer customers greater transparency. The report noted that the Swiss government and the United Nations “consider the settlements to be illegal under international law.”

A spokeswoman for Migros, Monika Weibel, told SwissInfo that Migros doesn’t support boycott calls by pro-Palestinian Authority Arab groups, but does want to let customers decide which products they want to buy. Weibel said the chain previously identified the products only as coming from Israel.

The report noted that as of 2013, products will be labeled as originating from “East Jerusalem, Israeli settlement zone” or “West Bank, Israeli settlement zone”.

The chain’s decision comes several days after South Africa’s Department of Trade and Industry announced that products produced by Israeli companies in Judea and Samaria cannot be labeled as products of Israel.

Minister Rob Davies issued an announcement warning merchants “not to incorrectly label products that originate from the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) as products of Israel.”

The Foreign Ministry later announced Israel’s intention to summon the South African ambassador, Ismail Coovadia, for clarifications over the matter, adding that Israel will act in the coming days to have the labeling announcement cancelled.

“This is singling Israel out on a clearly political basis,” said Palmor. “This decision has racist characteristics.”

Davies himself later rejected “with utter contempt” suggestions that there were racial motivations for his move.

Davies was adamant that his department was neither seeking to promote a boycott of Israeli goods nor to prevent the entry of such products into South Africa. He asserted, however, that the move was aimed at ensuring that products were correctly labeled so that South African consumers could decide for themselves as to whether they wanted to purchase them.

Boycottez le Supermarché suisse Migros !!!

La chaîne de la Suisse le plus grand supermarché Migros, a annoncé mardi qu’il dira à ses clients si les produits proviennent de communautés juives en Judée-Samarie (Shomron) et Jérusalem-Est.

Judée et Samarie
Selon un rapport sur SwissInfo, la raison pour laquelle la décision est le désir de Migros pour offrir aux clients une plus grande transparence. Le rapport a noté que le gouvernement suisse et l’Organisation des Nations Unies «d’envisager les colonies de peuplement illégales en vertu du droit international.”

Un porte-parole de Migros, Monika Weibel, a indiqué à swissinfo que Migros ne prend pas en charge les appels au boycott par les groupes pro-palestiniens Autorité arabes, mais ne veulent permettre aux clients de décider quels produits qu’ils veulent acheter. Weibel a déclaré la chaîne précédemment identifié les seuls produits comme provenant d’Israël.

Le rapport a noté que, de 2013, les produits seront étiquetés comme provenant de “Jérusalem-Est, zone de la colonisation israélienne» ou «la Cisjordanie, la zone de colonisation israélienne”.

La décision de la chaîne vient quelques jours après l’Afrique du Sud Département du Commerce et de l’Industrie a annoncé que les produits fabriqués par des entreprises israéliennes en Judée et Samarie ne peut pas être étiquetés comme produits d’Israël.

Ministre Rob Davies a publié un avertissement marchands annonce “de ne pas étiqueter correctement les produits qui proviennent du territoire palestinien occupé (TPO) en tant que produits d’Israël.”

Le ministère des Affaires étrangères a annoncé plus tard intention d’Israël de convoquer l’ambassadeur d’Afrique du Sud, Ismail Coovadia, des éclaircissements sur la question, ajoutant qu’Israël agira dans les prochains jours pour avoir l’annonce d’étiquetage annulée.

“Ceci est singulariser Israël sur une base clairement politique”, a déclaré Palmor. “Cette décision a des caractéristiques racistes.”

Davies lui-même plus tard rejeté “avec mépris” proférer des suggestions qu’il y avait des motivations raciales pour son déménagement.

Davies a affirmé catégoriquement que son département n’a été ni en cherchant à promouvoir un boycott des produits israéliens, ni pour empêcher l’entrée de ces produits en Afrique du Sud. Il a affirmé, toutefois, que la décision visait à s’assurer que les produits étaient correctement étiquetés afin que les consommateurs sud-africains pourraient décider eux-mêmes quant à savoir si ils voulaient les acheter.




Swiss supermarket chain piously marks product origins

Switzerland’s Migros supermarket chain has piously decided to give its customers ‘more information.’ Specifically, they have decided to mark products that are manufactured in ‘east’ Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.
Migros stated that it wanted to offer customers greater transparency, adding that the Swiss government and the UN consider settlements illegal.

The company spokeswoman, Monika Weibel, stated on Tuesday that Migros does not support boycotts but rather wants to let customers make informed decisions.
Migros joins Britain, Denmark and South Africa.

I wonder why they’re not marking products from Tibet, Chechnia or Northern Cyprus…. No, I don’t wonder. This is Switzerland and they have a history of this stuff.
Labels: anti-Semitism, BDS, settlement product boycott


The Syrian ambassador to Switzerland declared persona non grata

The Syrian ambassador to Switzerland declared persona non grata

GENEVA – The Syrian ambassador to Switzerland, Chakkour Lamia, which was based in Paris where she was also representing his country, was declared persona non grata, said the Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DFA), alleging breach of systematic resolutions of the Security Council of the UN and the lack of implementation of the Annan Plan.

The DFA has communicated this decision by a diplomatic note to the Syrian Foreign Ministry today, said the Swiss authorities, in an email to AFP.

Switzerland intends to protest against the systematic violation of resolutions 2042 (2012) and 2043 (2012) Security Council and the UN against the lack of implementation of the six-point plan of UN special envoy Kofi Annan on Syria.

Bern joins the announcements made that day by other European countries, including France, the UK and Germany.

French President Francois Hollande has announced Tuesday that Syria’s ambassador to Paris was to be deported on Tuesday or Wednesday in response to the massacre of Hula which the UN says has killed at least 108 victims.

The majority of the 108 victims, including 49 children and 34 women, were executed, according to preliminary results of a UN investigation. Moreover, 32 of the 49 children killed were under 10 years. Damascus denies involvement of its troops.

For its part, Switzerland has condemned the massacre and called Hula louverture dune international investigation.

In general, Switzerland has repeatedly condemned violations of human rights committed in Syria. She also called on Syrian authorities to immediately halt the use of violence and repression against the civilian population and take steps to ensure that those responsible are prosecuted in court.

Switzerland has also asked the Syrian authorities to allow humanitarian access to affected populations and to work unhindered.

Bern also states want to engage multilaterally, either to the General Assembly of the Council or lONU of human rights, for the alleged perpetrators of human rights committed during the fighting in Syria remain unpunished.

In protest against the unacceptable violence inflicted on the population of Syria, Damascus lambassadeur of Switzerland was recalled to Bern August 18, 2011 for consultation. Lambassade was closed in late February 2012 for security reasons.
(© AFP / May 29, 2012 7:19 p.m.)

L’ambassadrice de Syrie pour la Suisse déclarée persona non grata

GENEVE – L’ambassadrice de Syrie pour la Suisse, Lamia Chakkour, qui était basée à Paris où elle représentait également son pays, a été déclarée persona non grata, a indiqué le ministère des Affaires étrangères suisse (DFAE), invoquant la violation systématique de résolutions du Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU et le manque de mise en oeuvre du plan Annan.

Le DFAE a communiqué cette décision par une note diplomatique au ministère syrien des Affaires étrangères aujourd’hui, ont précisé les autorités suisses, dans un courriel envoyé à l’AFP.

La Suisse entend ainsi protester contre la violation systématique des résolutions 2042 (2012) et 2043 (2012) du Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU et contre le manque de mise en oeuvre du plan en six points de l’émissaire spécial de l’ONU sur la Syrie Kofi Annan.

Berne se joint ainsi aux annonces faites dans la journée par d’autres pays européens, dont la France, le Royaume-Uni et l’Allemagne.

Le président français François Hollande a ainsi annoncé mardi que l’ambassadrice de Syrie à Paris allait être expulsée mardi ou mercredi en réponse au massacre de Houla qui selon l’ONU a fait au moins 108 victimes.

La majorité des 108 victimes, dont 49 enfants et 34 femmes, ont été exécutées, selon les premiers résultats d’une enquête de l’ONU. Par ailleurs, 32 des 49 enfants tués avaient moins de 10 ans. Damas nie l’implication de ses troupes.

Pour sa part, la Suisse a condamné le massacre de Houla et demandé louverture dune enquête internationale.

De manière générale, la Suisse a condamné à plusieurs reprises les violations des droits de lhomme commises en Syrie. Elle a également appelé les autorités syriennes à mettre immédiatement fin à l’usage de la violence et à la répression contre la population civile et à prendre des mesures pour que les personnes responsables soient poursuivies devant la justice.

La Suisse a aussi demandé aux autorités syriennes de permettre aux acteurs humanitaires d’accéder aux populations affectées et de pouvoir travailler sans entraves.

Berne indique par ailleurs vouloir s’engager sur le plan multilatéral, que ce soit à l’Assemblée générale de lONU ou au Conseil des droits de lhomme, pour que les auteurs présumés des violations des droits de lhomme commis lors des affrontements en Syrie ne demeurent pas impunis.

En signe de protestation contre les violences inacceptables infligées à la population syrienne, lambassadeur de Suisse à Damas a été rappelé à Berne le 18 août 2011 pour consultation. Lambassade a été fermée fin février 2012 pour des raisons de sécurité.
(©AFP / 29 mai 2012 19h19)


Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood is gaining influence over anti-Assad revolt

Happening Right Now In Luton

2:26 PM – 29 Mai

Re Sikh girl abused: Luton Police Station with approx 500 sikhs and the Muslim is to be released shortly. Anyone that wants to join in please come now.
Message approx 9:45pm.

“all going off down Luton police station ,Sikhs protesting against muslim rapist about to freed ,best get down there eh ! ee edl ”

“Luton Town Centre closed off due to Sikhs protesting outside Police Station over young sikh girl raped”


well the mulim who raped a sikh girl did not expect the other minority turning out in Luton tonight the sikh community along with the E D L are on the streets of Luton IF ANY ONE IS CLOSE BY LUTON POLICE STATION IS WHERE THE DEMO IS NSFE

Luton Police Station with approx 500 sikhs and the Muslim is to be released shortly. Anyone that wants to join in please come now

This is community spirit EDL and the Sikhs together as one!!/EDLTrobinson

+No Surrender Brothers and Sisters Of The EDL+


“I read the raped girl’s mother went to the police 4 times about the rape and the
police did nothing.
I hope the abused girl draws some comfort from the fact that people are prepared to rise up and
demand that she gets justice and is treated with respect.”

Sikhs in Luton police station sit-down protestHundreds of members of the Sikh community have staged a sit-down protest outside Buxton Road police station in Luton.

A police spokesman said the protesters had concerns after a report that a young woman from their community was sexually assaulted on Monday.

The allegation is being investigated by Bedfordshire Police and a man has been arrested in the inquiry.

Police are trying to resolve the situation with community leaders.


Sikhs protest outside Luton Police station over ‘assault’ allegationsPosted: May 30, 2012 in News Feed

HUNDREDS of members of the Sikh community protested outside Luton Police Station last night following allegations that a young woman had been sexually assaulted.

Scores of Sikh men and women converged on the Buxton Road station at around 9pm after the allegations were made following an incident on Monday.

Protestors, many of them from outside of Luton, blocked one side of Stuart Street with concerns over police handling of the incident.

Several English Defence League supporters joined the Sikhs in protest.

Representatives from the Sikh community were invited into the police station to discuss their concerns, but police, some with police dogs, eventually guarded the entrance to the station and herded protestors away from Buxton Road.

The group were eventually escorted back to the Dallow Road temple and eventually dispersed before midnight.

Police had met with members of the community at the Gurdwara in Dallow Road earlier in the day to address their concerns.

Officers say that they are continuing to work with members of the community to ensure that they are kept up-to-date.

Beds Police Chief Supt Mike Colbourne said: “Obviously we have a duty to facilitate lawful, peaceful protest and if people have concerns it is right they are aired responsibly. Our priority first and foremost, however, is with the victim in this matter and her family.”

A man has since been charged with common assault following the incident and will appear at Luton Magistrates Court this morning.


UPDATE 1.06 2012

Luton Sikh-Muslim protest: ‘Positive’ police meetingPosted: May 31, 2012 in News Feed
0A “constructive” and “positive” meeting has been held between police and the Sikh and Muslim communities following a protest at a Luton police station.

The groups held talks on Wednesday after hundreds of Sikhs gathered at Buxton Road on Tuesday night.

The protest was over allegations a Muslim man had assaulted a Sikh woman.

Police said officers were working with the two groups and wanted any concern about criminal activity to be reported.

‘Cultural sensitivities’

Speaking after the meeting, Sikh representative Jaswinder Singh Nagra said: “I think it was very constructive.

“We need to educate the police about our cultural sensitivities.”

His thoughts were echoed by Qazi Abdul Aziz Chishti, president of the Sunni Mosque Council in Luton, who was also at the meeting.

“We will work together not only on this issue, but on all issues,” he told the BBC.

“We have formed a working group with the Sikh community.”

Bedfordshire Police Ch Supt Mike Colbourne said: “We want the public to report any issues, fears or concerns that they have.”

 H/T :

The shape of “Justice” in Britain today – whites jailed for words, immigrants who assault walk free #edl


Wafa Sultan : A Voice Of Courage

The Islamists’ Enablers: The Western Sellout to Sharia Law
by Wafa Sultan
May 23, 2011 at 5:00 am

There is no doubt that free speech, the bedrock of democracy and civilization, is under dangerous assault in many Western countries, by a variety of leading organizations and individuals who align themselves with Muslim institutions.

They all promote the fantasy of Muslim victimhood, and force the West to overprotect Muslims, to ignore their atrocities, and to surrender to their escalating demands.

Around the world, Muslims enforce non Muslims compliance and deliberate air-brushing of the extent and magnitude of the Islamic threat — from holy war, or Jihad, to the treatment of women under Islam. As approved by Sharia dictates, Muslims also try to forbid non-Muslims from speaking critically about Islam.

How do they accomplish this? They name anyone who engages in an honest examination of Islamic texts as a bigot, or full of hate, or call him an “Islamophobe.” Dissent brings trials for non-specific “hate-speech” crimes, as well as threats of riots, violence and boycotts. In many worst-case scenarios, Muslims kill non Muslims, as well as those brave Muslims who dare to defy mind-control and suppression.

Only a few days ago the courageous Lars Hedegaard was found guilty of so called “hate speech” for having made allegedly racist statements. Yet, Mr. Hedegaard has been telling the truth. He has been bringing to the public’s attention the appalling widespread Islamic ‘honor’ violence, in which family members are directed kill female relatives, reportedly to “restore family honor,” for “crimes” such as as being raped — often by a family member; the woman is always declared guilty, never the rapist — as well as for alleged adultery, even if there is no proof, but just “a feeling” the judges may have as in the recent case of Hena in Bangladesh. who was sentenced to 300 lashes, and during the lashings died.

* * *

During my thirty-two years of living in Syria, I have witnessed first hand countless acts of vicious violence and cruelty. As a practicing physician in Syria, I have seen and treated countless abused women who were severely beaten and raped with the tacit approval of Sharia and family “honor.”

Those victims I treated were of the same type of victims honor violence to which Mr. Hedegaard referred, and for which he is now being penalized by those who are supposed to be championing the same values we all hold dear in the West.

By suppressing the freedom to expose atrocities and cruelty against Muslim women, however, the West undermines their status as respected and valued citizens. Is this what government leaders seek to accomplish? Are Muslim women who suffer immensely under Sharia Law, including in the West, not worthy of government protection?

As a physician, I am alarmed at the coordinated effort by Islamists and their accomplices in the West to disrupt this basic right to freely express and expose what needs to be corrected.

The horrific attack on 9/11 has brought to light the recognition that no spot on Earth is immune to Islamism. My own personal stories — my opthamology teacher in medical school in Syria, for example, was shot and killed in front of us because he was teaching female students — apply to all of us.

As long as there are Muslims within our societies who promote Islamic Sharia Law and work tirelessly to apply it in our free societies, we need to be educated, vigilant and active in defending our liberties. It is one issue that all of us must be concerned about and strongly attentive to.

I am not here to incite anyone against Muslims. Please understand that Muslims are my people, and under any circumstances I wouldn’t be able to peel off my own skin and be anything else but a woman from a Muslim country and the Islamic culture. But I am here to unearth the true face of Islam as a hateful and intolerant ideology, including its treatment of women.

Osama Bin Laden is now dead and gone. But the harsh and intolerable Sharia Law he so faithfully practiced is alive and thriving. Bin Laden’s life and horrific actions are clear proof that Islamists are victims of an intolerable dogma that lures them away from their inherent common sense, and turns them into human beasts.

At a very early age, they are brainwashed to believe that Islam is bound to control the entire world, and that their mission on earth is to fight for the sake of this goal. For this, the end justifies the means — therefore humiliating, torturing or killing others is a divine mission.

Lara Logan, the CBS journalist who covered the recent Egyptian revolution broke the wall of silence on a program called “60 minutes,” by sharing the sexual violence that was inflicted on her as a female and a foreign journalist in the field. In her own words, she stated that the Egyptian mob who assaulted her “really enjoyed my pain and suffering. It incited them to more violence.”

For many Westerners this is a vivid view into the shocking treatment and continuous harassment of native women, as well as foreign women, in Egypt.

This practice persists due to Muslim inculcation of hostility to, and derision of, women. To add salt to wound, Muslims blame only the victim — for supposedly falling short of Islamic restrictions on dress and behavior and thereby “enticing” the men.

Unfortunately, in her interview, Logan submitted to the persisting political correctness, and was careful not to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam” with connection to the terrible sexual ordeal against her.

Let me share with you only few personal stories. These are tales which only affirm Lara Logan’s deplorable episode, and prove the pervasiveness of the abuse of women in the Muslim world.

My own niece was forced to marry her cousin when she was eleven and he was over forty. Her marriage was valid under Islamic Sharia because the prophet Muhammad married his second wife, Aisha when she was 6 years old and he was over fifty. My niece for many years was terribly abused and did not have the right to ask for a divorce.

She would escape from her husband’s house to her father’s, begging him; “Please let me stay here. I promise to be your maid to the last day of my life. He is so abusive; I can’t take this torture any more.” Her father would reply, “It’s shame for a woman to leave her husband’s home without his permission. Go back. I promise I will talk to him”

At the age of 28, my niece committed suicide by setting herself on fire; she left behind four children.

While working as a physician in Syria, I witnessed many crimes committed in my society in the name of Islam. Once, when I worked in a small village, a woman in her late thirties came to my office complaining of nausea, vomiting and back pain. An examination revealed that she was three months pregnant. As soon as I told her the news, she collapsed on the chair and began to scream, smacking her face, “I beg you doctor, I beg you to rescue me from the mess I’m in. My son will kill me. I don’t care about my life. I deserve to die, but I don’t want my son to dirty his hands with my blood.”

“What is wrong, Fatima?” I asked.

“My husband died five years ago and left me with four children. His brother rapes me every day in exchange for feeding my children. If he knew I was pregnant he would provoke my son, who is 15, into killing me rather than be exposed to public disgrace.”

I sent her to see a gynecologist. When she came back to see me about two weeks later, she looked gaunt, haggard and ill. “I came to thank you.” she said. “But they performed the operation to remove the fetus without an anesthetic. I didn’t have enough money to pay for the drugs to sedate me, so the doctor had to operate without them. The pain was unbearable. I nearly died”

As for my own story, my husband left for America a year ahead of me. When I submitted a request for passports for my children, the officer in charge refused to grant me one on the grounds that under the Islamic Sharia law I was not considered mentally fit to be the legal guardian of my children. He therefore asked me to bring a male from my husband’s family who would allow us to get my children’s passports.

No member of my husband’s family lived in our town except one of his cousins. He was an alcoholic, and because of his ill nature, my husband had never wanted to introduce him to me. To make a long story short, I went to his house and bribed him with fifty Syrian pounds which is equal to one dollar. As I left the immigration building, I couldn’t help thinking of the absurdity that we, women of the Muslim world are faced with: as a medical doctor, I wasn’t fit to be the legal guardian of my children, but a drunken man could control my entire destiny.

It is obvious that the teaching of my faith did not coincide with my basic rights, and for sure did not respect me as a professional woman. Under Islamic Sharia Law, for example, male Muslims are granted full control over their female relatives. A father can marry his daughter off at any age to any man of his choice without her consent.

Tragically, these accounts that I share with you, are not isolated stories by any means. They signify tragic stories of millions of other Muslim women all over the world, including here in Europe and in North America. On a daily bases, there are countless domestic abuses of Muslim women: rapes and honor killings which are frequently ignored by the so called “progressives,” who claim to be such big supporters of human rights..

Many in the establishment legally prosecute those brave people who dare to speak up and expose the dismal reality of violence against Muslim women, and the harsh reality of Sharia Law in general. Many people forbid our society from labeling the Islamic discrimination and maltreatment of women. Obviously, as we are presently witnessing, especially in Europe, the consequences for those who dare, are grave.

Accordingly, let me challenge those who are on the wrong side of history; how can a Muslim woman raise a fair-minded child when she is oppressed herself? Certainly, a male child who grows up watching his mother being treated with no respected, marginalized and abused, will almost inevitably have a distorted view that such behavior against women id permissible and normal; and be capable of the type of cruelty that was inflicted by the mob against Lara Logan. Is that not a dilemma which affects the West’s relationship with the Muslim world?

Sadly, Muslims and their enablers will keep defying those of us who dissent. We have a choice to make. We can continue to give in, or we can win people over by making it clear that our freedoms and our culture and our heritage will be protected — no matter what it takes.

In his show “Real Time” Bill Maher, an American comedian, stated last month: “Islam is the only religion that ‘kills you when you disagree with it. They claim: ‘Look, we are a religion of peace…and if you disagree we shall cut off your head.'” Maher predicts that “there are very few people who will call them on it.”

We are some of the very few who will call them on it. We are here with clarity and conviction to identify, to expose and, we hope, to marginalize the enemies of the free world. We are here to deter the destruction of our values by those who aspire to enslave us under the harsh and intolerable shackles of Sharia Law.

When a woman living under Islamic Sharia Law immigrates to a free Western country, it can become a complete transformative path, as happened to me. Now that I am free, I do not have to allow my rights to be abused by any religious or political authority. In the United States I am a person — equal to all others.

But how can we expect all other Muslim women in all parts of the free world to become emancipated when there are judicial institutions that help suppress their urge for freedom by punishing those who try to protect them, as happens to individuals like Lars Hedegaard, Geert Wilders, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Kurt Westergaard, Jesper Langballe, Ezra Levant, Rachel Ehrenfeld, Joe Kaufman and Mark Steyn among others? Too often, the West seems indifferent to its denigration by Islam. Times are difficult nowadays.

I, for one, do not take my rights for granted, and therefore I will continue to fight to protect these rights, not only for me but for all other Muslim women.

As citizens of the free world, we must have the moral aptitude to fight and protect our liberty by exposing the totalitarian abuse of Islam against women.

The enemy has both unwitting and malevolent allies. We are obliged to call on those who surrender to Islam’s oppressive doctrine, those who weaken all of us and unintentionally — or some deliberately — cause our decline.

We must realize that we are in a war. We must continue our unwavering resolve to serve as a buffer against the forces of evil. We cannot appease. We cannot compromise. We must recognize the enemies, and deter them at every pass.

We will not stifle our language. We will use the appropriate vocabulary to call things by their rightful name. We will continue to press for moral clarity, for open intellectual discourse with the precise definitions of our goals against their goals.

From now on, let us invoke the new terminology, “Truthphobes,” against those who call us “Islamophobes. “This is because their irrational fear of the truth is a detrimental factor for our survival as free people.

The bitter reality of Islam’s Sharia doctrine should not be ignored. Real victory can take place only in the spirit of genuine inquiry, transparency, and the fearless pursuit of truth. A culture that does not respect half of its population will never thrive and prosper.

Consequently, any attempt to make criticism of Islam forbidden and punishable by law is intolerable and will be strongly resisted by all people who love freedom.

When I was living in Syria, I cried often because I suffered. Now that I am free, I still cry, but for all other Muslim women over the world. I dream of a future when all Muslim women can savor a taste of my freedom. This is a dream that should be granted for all humanity and our job is to be unrelenting in pursuing that objective.

I challenge anyone responsible for the trial against Lars Hedegaard to reconsider the horrendous consequences of such preposterous allegations against him. Let us not revert to the Europe of the Middle Ages.

Let freedom of speech prevail.



“All we want is justice for Charlene.”
“All we want is justice for Charlene.”
“All we want is justice for Charlene.”

The rising Islamist trend could have far-reaching implications for transforming regional relationships.

Or could it be,  that regional relationships implications has made possible The rising of Islamist in a new trend ?

EUROPE, Wake Up and Defend Yourself!

EUROPE, Wake Up and Defend Yourself!

Christianity and European Pagan Culture being the dominant feature in shaping European culture for at least the last 1700 years.

The culture of Europe might better be described as a series of overlapping cultures. Whether it is a question of West as opposed to East; Christianity as opposed to Islam; many have claimed to identify cultural fault lines across the continent. There are many cultural innovations and movements, often at odds with each other, such as Christian proselytism or Humanism. Thus the question of “common culture” or “common values” is far more complex than it seems.

Our Civilization is under attack and we are in a Cultural war with forces of barbarism, Totalitarianism and stand in front of a new Neo-Fascism in the 21rst Century from outside which is Islamic Fascism and from inside which is the Marxist off springs Socialism, Communism, Supranationalism, multiculturalism and left radical ideologies and ‘progressive’ movements.
Defending our freedoms and Liberties is an ongoing struggle.

In the last years, we are witnessing a dangerous process which takes place in the continent of Europe.
Europe changes its face every day, and in 2050, if necessary steps are not taken within the next decades, we will find ourselves in an Islamic continent.
The dangerous process is caused by the European Muslims, but also by their supporters and weak politicians.

As a result of intensified immigration from Muslims countries and high fertility among Muslims, the demographic forecast is horrendous.

In some countries, the Muslims already started to demand autonomy ruled by the fanatic religious “Sharia” system of law in some regions.
Sooner than we think, the European women will be deprived of their rights and will must wear an Islamic traditional Hijab and even worse.

If you think we must do something to save our European values and culture from the Jaws of Islam – Come and Join us before it’s too late!

Muslims want you to make way for Islam,
but Islam does not make way for you.

The government insists that you respect Islam,
but Islam has no respect for you.

Islam wants to rule, submit, and seeks
to destroy our western civilization.

In 1945, Nazism was defeated in Europe.
In 1989, Communism was defeated in Europe.

Now the Islamic ideology has to be defeated.

* The immediate cessation of any immigration from muslim countries.
* The deportation of all illegal muslim immigrants residing in Europe.
* Islamic schools and institutions all over Europe must be closed.
* A complete prohibition of wearing any Islamic traditional clothing
* and Save the European Culture and Values !


GREAT SPEACH ! Of Few Words Reflecting Tragedy Of Too Many !








GREAT SPEACH ! Of Few Words Reflecting Tragedy Of Too Many !

Unfortunately This Speech Been Interrupted and success to distract you from this speech !
But ear this man, ear what he say. And for once the sound in this video is good.
Easy to be understood, refer to Outrageous Crimes Happening In Great Britain. And I said CRIMES it’s no one.. or some isolate headline of a newspaper.. It’s many and it increased and further Outrageous it’s been for years.. And Who Dare say something is called a Racist or many other word that undermine THE REAL ISSUE !

The Video been published on yesterday the 26 of May 2012 and is from the Redditch Demo

I’ve received this Via The Casuals United Blog  Thanks.  

+ No Surrender+

Ok chaps, this is your chance to do some good today,

this Green councillor down in Brighton is a member of Sussex police authority,

yet he supports the violent anarchist group who attacked the MFE march and injured the little girl :



Its piss easy to fill in and will take you seconds. Dont just “like” this and do nothing, lets bombard them with complaints, because we can.



Swiss Pastor Dr. Christine Dietrich Under Investigation For Political Incorrectness !

Swiss Pastor Dr. Christine Dietrich Under Investigation For Political Incorrectness !

(Small personal Add : A Reformist Priest ? The Local News is strange ..What About A Catholic Imam ??)

Well Two Different Way of Bringing The News…  :

Priest who runs racist website faces probe
Published: 25 May 2012 11:34 GMT+1 
By The Local News 

A Reformist priest  from a tiny Bernese village is under investigation by church leaders after it emerged that she helped run a fanatical anti-Islamic website.
The Council of Reformist Churches for Bern, Solothurn and Jura has criticised the priest, and declared her activities on website ‘Politically Incorrect’ to be “incompatible” with her position as a priest due to the “Islam-baiting” that takes place on it, newspaper Tages Anzeiger reported.

The priest has been involved for a long time with the Politically Incorrect forum, a website frequented mainly by Germans, and has been operating clandestinely, the newspaper reported.

It has been alleged that the priest has been funding the website herself, the Tages Anzeiger reported. The prosecutor also believes it possible that she has been contributing some of the racist content, albeit under pseudonyms.

The Council had already warned the priest previously for her participation at extreme-right Islamophobic events in Germany. Having reviewed the content of the website, the Council described the articles posted there as “inflammatory and derogatory”.

The priest is now accused of breaching anti-racism laws and of failing to prevent criminal acts. Despite the accusations, she has still been permitted by her immediate superiors to continue to preach in the village.

An estimated 33 percent of the Swiss population are thought to be Reformist, although numbers much lower than this actually attend service regularly.

(Small personal Add 2 :  I don’t know the number, but in Switzerland The Reform Is A Very Active Church ! And Its History Goes Back To The Very Founders Of The Reform !
33 % seems very low … and tend to minimise the Impact of This Pastor Trying to bring her to a Minority !  And Since the Article start by “Reform Priest” and “fanatical anti-Islamic website”… I take that for a poor misleading LIE !!!)

So Here From The Politically Incorrect Blog : (you know the “fanatical anti-Islamic website”) See For Self link end of page. Wilhem Swiss Defence League.

The story almost brings a Middle Ages court of Inquisition to mind. Swiss pastor Dr. Christine Dietrich wrote for years for PI – examples of her writing include such subjects as the right of Israel to existence, one of her main concerns. And against the misogyny of Islam, its affinity for violence, its legitimization of murder as well as its totalitarian claim to power. But all of that is no longer allowed these days. Political Correctness appears also to have fully seized the Swiss Evangelical Church in its stranglehold. Christine Dietrich must henceforth keep her distance from PI because they are a “blog of hate and agitation.” Note: The one who writes about the hate and incitement of a totalitarian ideology is himself an agitator.
(By Michael Stürzenberger)

Various Swiss newspapers are reporting about the end of the ecclesiastical “investigation.” 20-Minuten Online, for example, adorned the story with the headline “Pastor To Keep Distance From Agitation Blog.” The synodal council, after ongoing investigations gave the decree: Hands away from PI. Even though her articles there most obviously produced nothing that could be objectionable:

The investigation resulted in no proof of islamophobic statements or writings by the pastor from Siselen-Finsterhennen, the synodal council recorded. No “hate sermons” were recognized, and the agitant expressions for which she was charged did not come from her.

But yet, she is supposed to stay away from PI, since “degrading and agitating articles” can be read there. At the end of the Inquisition, she bravely promised the following according to 20-Minuten Online (whether she had already been put on the rack wasn’t mentioned):

She stood positively in favor of dialog with an enlightened Islam.

The fable of the legendary “enlightened” Islam – also readily called “Euro-”islam – exists only as long as Muslims are in the minority. Anyone who has even a beginning in dealing with this ideology knows that. When positions of power are finally achieved, then the complete program of the Quran is employed. Anything else would mean blasphemy and apostasy. It is a tragedy that such a knowledgeable, well-read and likeable critic of Islam could be rendered invalid. That’s life in 2012.

“Whose bread I eat, his song I sing,” is how things are. What is left to do when someone is threatened with their existence? As for Islam, we have already long lived under lack of any democratic conditions. These unbearable measures of censorship and reeducation are all precursors of coming religious dictatorship, the full force of which our children and grandchildren will suffer.

The fact that 20-Minuten Online likes at times to fashion its own truths together can be recognized even from the article’s photo series where several factual errors can be seen right away. Fine that Christian Jung and Marco Pino are no longer with the FREEDOM party, but more than likely it still hasn’t been talked about much around Switzerland. But the fact that I was kicked out of the CSU for “islamophobia,” is something new to me. I always thought I had declared my departure in writing on May 25, 2011, so that I could candidate on June 4th for a post on the Bavarian regional FREEDOM committee. But perhaps somebody in the 20-Minuten Online editorial office knew better. And without asking at the branch office of the Munich CSU, as journalists who are interested in objective reporting should actually do.

Der Bund in Bern also reports about the subject: “Seeland Pastor Keeps Hand Away From Agitation Blog“:

The synodal council concludes in their investigation that the controversial Seeland pastor has improved her ways.

“Improved.” Isn’t that nicely formulated. The main thing is that the pastor no longer write anything negative about Islam. Hardly worth talking about is the fact that annually 160,000 Christians are murdered in islamic countries, and around 100 million are being persecuted or discriminated against. It is much more important that a pastor “improve” her ways.

If every critic of Islam had such rigid employers as Christine Dietrich, then we could just hand over the keys to the local imams in a couple of decades. And the Swiss church rulers would be able to turn their churches into mosques and their towers into minarets. My compassion in such a case would be held in serious check because the butchers themselves are paying courtship to only the stupidest of calves.

Is it Racist to Criticize Islam?

%d bloggers like this: