Talking Heads Once In A Lifetime Parody


Talking Heads Once In A Lifetime Parody

 

Talking Heads – Once in a Lifetime (Official Video)

 

 

WilhelmTell

“Treasure out of Darkness”


...Back & Meaner Than Ever!

We all have seasons of darkness, depression, sadness, being forlorn…

We find our way when we get quiet before the Lord.  Put away the Ipad, the cell, the laptop, the pc.  Pick up your favorite book, even if its not the Bible.  GET FOCUSED.  You will find the answers you need in the QUIET.

For about 2 months, I have been in a super dark place after many disappointments.  The Ipad is my ‘g’od.  Truly, if we are honest, we can all say, the Ipad, laptop and so forth are our ‘g’od.

I am finally dumping the Ipad, (save an hour or up to 90 total minutes on it to catch up on emails, facebook, etc.)  I felt God saying to my heart: “Will you serve me by letting go of that Ipad?”  The first day, I was still out of sorts… but the second day, I felt more free…

View original post 212 more words

Jay Smith: Muhammad A Historical Critique (Video)


Boudica2015

Jay Smith: Muhammad A Historical Critique

KT Online Learning

View original post

Hopeless Hope, Hopefully Dopeless Hope, Still Is.. Hope..


NTO’ & Lucariello – Nuje Vulimme ‘na Speranza – 

(ENG – SUB)

From The Album : NTO’ & STIRPE NOVA – Numero 9

And : Gomorrah soundtrack

In The Lost And Found Box


Paradise is our native country, and we in this world be as exiles and strangers.
Richard Greenham (1535-1594)

 

 

 

Leftist Americans & Their Ape-Like Israeli Counterparts: Their Utopian Dreams, An Ever-Lurking National Nightmare! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki — Adina Kutnicki


“”MOST significantly, America and Israel – the twin pillars shoring up Western Civilization – are running out of time. Effectively, if national patriots fail to re-take and beat-back against the enemies within, it will be on their watch that both nations fall to the sword – be it wielded by the fascist-left (via a hybrid of socialists, Marxists, or communists), or the ever-brazen and assertive Muslims via political Islam.””

 

WITHIN the fascist-left – mind you, there is little progressive about them, that is, if said definition doesn’t include regression via strong-arm, mob-like tactics, most perniciously, as they storm through the (mis)educational system – you know, the “do as we say, or we will destroy each and everyone one of you” collective of rage-mongers, lies […]

via Leftist Americans & Their Ape-Like Israeli Counterparts: Their Utopian Dreams, An Ever-Lurking National Nightmare! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki — Adina Kutnicki

Edward Snowden : A Voice In The Web’erness


Full Interview: Edward Snowden On Trump, Privacy, And Threats To Democracy | The 11th Hour | MSNBC  

ART AND HISTORY : 1919-2019 Hundred Years Of BAUHAUS


Image associée

 

In 1919 an art school opened in Germany that would change the world forever. It was called the Bauhaus. A century later, its radical thinking still shapes our lives today.
Bauhaus 100 is the story of Walter Gropius, architect and founder of the Bauhaus, and the teachers and students he gathered to form this influential school. Traumatised by his experiences during the Great War, and determined that technology should never again be used for destruction, Gropius decided to reinvent the way art and design were taught. At the Bauhaus, all the disciplines would come together to create the buildings of the future, and define a new way of living in the modern world.

 

Résultat de recherche d'images pour "bauhaus"

How the Bauhaus built the future

In 1919, Walter Gropius established an art school in sleepy Weimar. Before long it had invented a new way of living for the 20th century.

https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2019/07/how-bauhaus-built-future

 

Image associée

 

Why “Islam IS RIGHT About Women” is Causing “Confusion & Anger”


Candace Owens Leaves Bâıťíñğ Democrat SPEECHLESS In Congress


What A Woman Isn’t She ?

Sept 2019

 

..”Religion Of Peace”..


 

Stiff Upper Lip The UK in the 21st Century


You May Have To Click The You Tube Link And Then Click Again :

The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks


WATCH: Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of 9/11 Attacks

FROM :

WATCH: Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of 9/11 Attacks

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the West, Dawa, and Islam (Video)


Boudica2015

Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the West, Dawa, and Islam

HooverInstitution

Published on Aug 3, 2017

Recorded on July 12, 2017 Ayaan Hirsi Ali joins Peter Robinson to discuss her new book, The Challenge of Dawa: Political Islam as Ideology and Movement and How to Contain It, and her views on the challenges facing Western civilization in regards to political Islam. She argues that Islam needs to be separated into two different parts, one part of religion and the other part, political philosophy. She concedes that many aspects of the religious part of Islam are peaceful but argues that the political side is much more concerning due to its focus on Dawa, which means “to plead or to call non-Muslims to Islam.” This call to convert people to Islam is what she argues was a driving force behind the spread of Islam throughout history. Hirsi Ali argues that American political philosophy…

View original post 546 more words

The Suicide of Europe (Video)


Boudica2015

The Suicide of Europe

PragerU

Published on May 14, 2018

Europe is committing suicide. How did this happen? In this video, Douglas Murray, author of The Strange Death of Europe, explains the two major causes of Europe’s impending downfall. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h Get PragerU bonus content for free! https://www.prageru.com/bonus-content Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU’s text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru

View original post 519 more words

An Education on Political Islam with Bill Warner: The Crusades and Jihad (Video)


Boudica2015

An Education on Political Islam with Bill Warner: The Crusades and Jihad

Apostate Prophet

Published on Dec 5, 2018

I sat down with Dr. Bill Warner to discuss the Crusades vs. Islamic Jihad, his definition of Political Islam, and why criticizing and informing on Islam is nowadays labeled as bigotry. I really enjoyed the talk. Hope you enjoy it, too. 🙂

View original post

Music : 22-Pistepirkko


22-Pistepirkko, is a Finnish popular music band formed in 1980.Their early albums were inspired by rock and roll and underground icons like Bo Diddley and The Sonics, but they have developed their unique sound by adding other influences to their music. Today they play an unconventional but distinctive mixture of pop, punk, rock and electronica, and achieved this fusion before artists such as Primal Scream or Beck popularized this kind of sound.(Wiki)

here comes my darling
saying hello you
hey why you look so worried
what’s so wrong with you
I felt something evil
lying in my room
it makes me really scared
don’t you feel it too

I know, it don’t really matter
does it really matter
if we go insane, my darling
do we always stick together
does it really matter
if we go insane, my darling

you said you saw shooting
on a market square
since when I have been dull
to see blood in everywhere
this time man was you uncle
you wonder what went wrong
he always looked so harmless walking on his own

I know…

 

 

Viktor Orban of Hungary: A Courageous Leader Who Cares Deeply For Hungary and Its People


Absolute Truth from the Word of God

I originally wrote this article  a few years ago. I had watched PM Viktor Orban of Hungary speak of things which were dear to my heart, and to the hearts of  Conservative and Patriotic Americans across our nation.

PM Orban is a hero to those in Europe who see their own countries being invaded by people who have no desire to assimilate.  This forced migration is part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Sounds great, doesn’t it?

It’s NOT.

Forced migration has goals, but Sustainable Development has nothing to do with these goals. The U.N. seeks a world without borders, where Patriotism is called Nationalism, which the Leftwing media equate with Nazi Germany and Hitler.

The unspoken truth that we must understand is that all of this points to a One World Government – that is the goal.  And it has been said many times that…

View original post 2,106 more words

The Chinese Claim The Uighurs Were Forced To Accept Islam (No Kidding)


Résultat de recherche d'images pour "Uyghur map"

The Chinese Claim The Uighurs Were Forced To Accept Islam — Are They Wrong?

(Horrific knife attack kills 29, injured 143 at a railway station in Kunming by Uyghur “separatist” jihadis.)
As is well known, with its usual ruthlessness the Chinese government has been trying to put the practice of Islam by the Uighurs of Xinjiang in a straitjacket. It has, for example, made it harder, or in some cases impossible, for the devout to observe Ramadan. The Chinese government in 2017 passed laws requiring all restaurants to stay open during Ramadan. Further, it has forbidden teachers, civil servants, and all those working in the public sector from observing Ramadan, and if any are caught doing so, the government ominously warns,  “they will be dealt with.”
Then there is the requirement that all “old’ Qur’ans, published before 2012, be handed in to the government’ only the “new Qur’ans” distributed by the Chinese government are permitted.The reason for this is that in 2012 the Chinese government published these “new” Qur’ans, heavily censored, with the “meaning’’ of the verses that remained annotated by government experts so as to lessen their anti-infidel message.
Muslims in Xinjiang must request government permission to go on the hajj. They are asked to register their age, job, health, and economic status. Strict guidelines are put in place for applicants, who must be aged between 50 and 70 and have lived in Urumqi, the region’s capital, for at least five years. They are thoroughly investigated by the government for their political views; anyone who has displayed the slightest hint of being politically unreliable is denied permission to go on the hajj.
All those who apply to go on the hajj must also pledge allegiance to the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and to national unity (and therefore against Uighur independence).
Indeed, Muslims who travel abroad for any reason, not just for the hajj, upon their return are subject to particular scrutiny, especially if they have spent any time in Muslim countries. More than one million have been placed in re-education centers.
As for other restrictions on Islam, in Xinjiang imams have been subject to public humiliation by being forced to dance en masse in public, and at the same time, have been forced to take an oath to keep children away from religion. As public servants, paid by the state, the imams were forced to brandish the slogan that “our income comes from the CKP not from Allah.” Many of the imams were forced to wave Chinese flags during their ordeal. Speeches are made — it’s unclear from the reports if these were by Chinese government officials or by government-approved imams — in which young people are told both to stay away from mosques and that prayer is harmful to one’s health. Teachers throughout Xinjiang have been instructed to teach children to shun religious study; retired teachers have been posted outside mosques during Ramadan to prevent students from entering.
Mosques have been required to push Communist propaganda, swapping inscriptions about Muhammad for red banners that declare, “Love the Party, Love the Country.”
Muslim men have been required to shave “abnormal” or “religious” beards; punishment is strict; one man was sentenced to six years in jail for refusing to do so. Names given to children must not be “religious.” Twenty-nine names have been banned so far, such as Islam, Saddam, Mecca, Quran, Jihad, Medina; all are now strictly forbidden.  Women may not wear any veils that cover the face; even women wearing only the hijab have been prevented in some parts of Xinjiang from using busses. Muslims are required to listen to the official state television (i.e., that carry anti-Muslim, and pro-Communist propaganda), and cannot prevent their children from attending state schools.
And of course we all know that more than a million Uighurs are now interned in re-education camps where they are subject to endless lessons attacking religion in general, and Islam in particular.
Given this record, it is understandable that 22 countries — though not a single Muslim one (for the Muslim states are afraid of Chinese economic retribution)– denounced the Chinese mistreatment of the Uighurs. But should we completely reject everything the Chinese have claimed about the Uighurs? They claim that the Uighurs are not a Turkic people. That is both true and false, They are not solely a Turkic people, but they are partly a Turkic people. Genetically they are a mix of of the Han Chinese and the Turkic peoples of Central Asia who lived and intermarried in the far western marches of China.
A white paper released in late July  by China’s State Council Information Office — the Government’s propaganda arm — presents the ruling Communist Party’s interpretation of history, claiming “Islam is neither an indigenous nor the sole belief system of the Uyghur people.” Is either of those claims false? Islam is indigenous only to the Middle East;  Islam arrived in western China when a local ruler, Tughlugh Timur Khan, converted to this foreign faith in the mid-14th century. Many of his subjects then followed his example .Furthermore, Islam is “not the sole belief system of the Uighur people.” That too is true; the Uighurs had been Tengriists, Manichaeans, Buddhists, and Nestorian Christians long before they became Muslims.
The Chinese White Paper also claims that Islam spread into Xinjiang by “the Arab Empire.” How did Islam spread out of Arabia, if not by the  Arabs warriors who subdued the rest of the Middle East, and all of North Africa, and then Spain, until they were finally defeated in central France by Charles Martel at Tours in 745? It was the warriors of an expanding “Arab Empire” who conquered Sassanian Persia. How did Islam arrive in Hindustan? Not through peaceful missionaries but through Muslim warriors, ghazis, who made many attempts at conquest before succeeding. It is understandable that the Chinese might identify this as the “Arab Empire” even if, by the time Muslim warriors reached from the western marches of China, very few were Arabs. To the Chinese the Muslims in Central Asia could be seen as ruling what could be regarded as an extension of the original “Arab Empire” in the Middle East. Islam was, as Anwar Sheikh has written, the “Arab national religion”; among Arabs it remains a vehicle for Arab supremacism; non-Arab Muslims, too, recognize the special status of Arabs within Islam.The Qur’an was given to a 7th century Arab, and in his language. The Qur’an ideally must be read in Arabic. Muslims turn five times a day, prostrate in prayer, toward Mecca, in Arabia. They are required, once in their lives, if financially able, to make the hajj to Mecca. Many non-Arab Muslims adopt Arab names and even false Arab lineages, as the many Pakistanis who affix a “Sayyid” to their names to indicate a factitious descent from the Quraysh, the tribe of the Prophet. That is why claiming that the Muslims in Central Asia formed part of an “Arab Empire,” while not ethnically accurate, makes a certain kind of religio-cultural sense. The Arabs were the first among equals; Islam was “the gift of the Arabs,” non-Arab Muslims assumed Arab names, and claimed Arab descent.  Given the primacy among Muslims of the Arabs, an Islamic empire, even if ethnically diverse, could be described by the distant Chinese as an “Arab Empire.”

The Chinese report on the Uighurs issued in late July claimed that the Turkic Uighur people “endured slavery” at the hands of “the Turks.” It is true that beginning in the mid-18th century there was a flourishing slave trade, within the Ottoman Empire,  and there were certainly Uighurs, as well as many other peoples, who supplied slaves to the Ottoman slave markets. And it appears that only the Turks — that is, the Ottomans — enslaved the Uighurs. History thus bears out the Chinese claim that the Uighur people “endured slavery’” at the hands of “the Turks.”

 

The Chinese report also claims that “Conversion to Islam was not a voluntary choice made by the common people, but a result of religious wars and imposition by the ruling class.” As for “imposition by the ruling class,” when Tughlugh Timur Khan in the mid-14th century converted to Islam, many of his subjects followed suit. The principle of “cuius regio, eius religio” — “the ruler’s religion becomes that of his realm”– as the Chinese maintain, applied to the Uighurs as to other peoples. The claim that conversion to Islam was also the result of religious wars — rather than the work of peaceful missionaries — is hardly surprising. War was the main way that the Arab tribes had spread their faith from the mid-seventh century on, and war — violent Jihad — remained the chief means of spreading the faith that came to dominate that vast expanse of territory from Islamic Spain through North Africa, the Middle East, Hindustan, and then to far western China.

The Chinese have certainly terribly mistreated the Uighurs. But that does not mean that their claims about the original islamization of the Uighurs are untrue. Uighurs were of many other faiths before they accepted Islam, not an indigenous faith but a foreign import. Islam was a late-comer to the area, and Uighurs  became Muslims in one of two ways: either through being conquered by Islamic peoples in “‘religious wars,” after which they would be  forcibly converted, or by having their rulers –such as Tughlugh Timur Khan in the mid-14 century — convert to Islam, which in turn led many of his subjects to follow suit  and peacefully accept the new faith (“imposition by the ruling class”). Some Uighurs were, like many other peoples, enslaved by the Ottomans (“the Turks”)’but here the Chinese claim is too sweeping, implying that all the Uighurs were treated thus  (“Uighurs were enslaved by the Turks”).
The Uighurs may speak a Turkic language, but they are not a purely Turkic people. They are  Sino-Turkic, distinct from either the Turks and the Chinese. Simply look at their photographs and you can see just how Chinese are many of their facial features, and how unlike the Turks in Turkey they look. They are a genetic blend, but it is the Chinese element that is more pronounced.

When the Chinese claim that Islam was “not the sole belief system of the Uighur people” they are absolutely correct. The Uighurs were Tengiists, Manichaeans, Buddhists and Nestorian Christians long before they accepted Islam.

Were the Chinese wrong? They claimed that the Uighurs are not a ‘Turkic” people. True, they are a Sino-Turkic people. They claimed that Islam spread among the Uighurs through religious wars or the “imposition by the ruling class.” True; wars of religious conquest spread Islam throughout central Asia as they had in so many other places; sometimes a ruler’s conversion would lead to the conversion of his subjects; that was what was meant by the “imposition by the ruling class.” Islam was “not indigenous to the area” but was brought by Muslim warriors, just as the Chinese claim. Islam was “not the sole belief system of the Uighur people”; long before Islam arrived the Uighurs were of many different faiths– Tengists, Manichaeans, Buddhists, and Nestorian Chistians.
The Chinese often mislead, but when they happen to be telling the truth, or telling part of the truth, as  they do about the Uighurs and Islam, why not recognize that, rather than consign them permanently to the outer darkness, without examining the accuracy of what they are saying? And if they properly identify how Islam  spread — through wars, or a ruler’s whim — surely that is useful knowledge. Condemn the Chinese all you want for their methods of ‘re-education”  but don’t dismiss those of their remarks about the Uighurs, the Turks, and Islam that just happen to be true.

THE GELLER REPORT (2019)

The Chinese Claim The Uighurs Were Forced To Accept Islam — Are They Wrong? (Part 1)

The Chinese Claim The Uighurs Were Forced To Accept Islam — Are They Wrong? (Part 2)

Anne Marie Waters // GI Conference with Q and A


The Great Replacement – Anne Marie’s talk from the recent Generation Identity UK Conference

%d bloggers like this: